A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Online access to civil and criminal cases in pick out circuit courts. Cases can be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.

4.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of in the future during the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness in the alleged prevalence as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired for being the real brothers on the deceased but they didn't respond in the least for the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak kind of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred by the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is likewise counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light within the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners jointly with a motorcycle at four.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it can be unclear how it relates to any presented situation, typically rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers and also the circumstances of your case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment about the offender, making sure They're held accountable for their actions.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge for the Judgment within time. Read more

Commonly, only an appeal accepted with the court of very last vacation resort will resolve this sort of differences and, more info For most reasons, these appeals are often not granted.

two. I have read the realized counsel for that parties in addition to discovered DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report on the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its opportunity to secure economic interests and maintain the integrity of your national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.

Because of this, simply citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling anyone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these neighborhood, without actually supplying them an address. Driving within the community endeavoring to find their phone is probably going to become more frustrating than it’s worth.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]